We can begin with our foundational belief: that a dead man,
after being murdered in a particularly brutal manner, rose again from the dead
and then spent forty days forming the community that now bears his name. After that, he floated up
into the sky.
That is difficult to believe.
For starters, “where is heaven?” The Gospel writers claim Jesus ascended there, but a contemporary person is left wondering what
that even means. We live on a globe surrounded by space in all directions. Obviously, the ‘heaven’ to which Jesus ascended cannot possibly refer to a real space-time
location like Cleveland or Calcutta.
So yes, these are preposterous things. They challenge our
credulity. And yet, I believe them. I am an educated person so I speculate how
these beliefs can be credibly accepted or explained. However, they do not seriously challenge my
faith.
The greatest challenge I have about our faith is the
question of personal transformation. I wonder if Christians ever become “new
creatures.” The New Testament claims our conversion leads to transformation.
That word points to a change as radical as when caterpillars turn into butterflies or tadpoles into frogs.
But does this occur? Are Christians really that different
than non-Christians?
We can avoid the question by claiming that although our transformation has not yet occurred, it will, “in another time and another
place.” The New Testament does indeed teach that our greatest
transformation occurs after death and ‘glorification.' Nonetheless, it also teaches that we are
being made new now, in this life. The Apostle Paul even says we become like ‘living
Bibles.’
Traditionally, Christians used the word ‘saint’ to describe
this New Testament belief in personal transformation.
Modern Evangelicals – at least ones I know -- find that word distasteful,
even when referring to the apostles. They like it even less when we use it to talk
about folks like Francis of Assisi or Augustine of Hippo.
“Aren’t we all saints,” they ask?
Yes.
No.
The New Testament teaches that we cannot save ourselves,
that we are saved by Christ, though his graciousness and mercy. Jesus
transforms us because we trust in Him. Therefore, he declares us ‘saints.’ He
accepts us as holy – ‘just-as-if ‘— although we are not and invites believers
to view themselves in that light.
That explanation does not solve my question though.
The New Testament leads us expect that the effects of this ‘just-as-if’
declaration becomes gradually visible now, in this world, in this life. As a believer walks into the new life God has
given him through grace, his ‘old man’ dies away and his ‘new man’ walks in the
newness of life.
But does this happen?
After a lifetime of Christian service and practice, serving
as a missionary and a pastor in multiple situations and in multiple places, I
can only say, “it seems to happen sometimes.”
Personal transformation is the exception and not the norm.
Indeed, I don’t even see much concern for personal transformation among church leaders,
or believers in general for that matter.
Furthermore, personal transformation on the magnitude of
what scripture describes ought to have a huge effect on those communities in
which Christians predominate. Such communities ought to flourish – or so it
seems to me – in all areas of human life and thought, in ways that manifest, or
at least hint at the coming kingdom when “the glory of the Lord will fill the
earth.”
One should at least expect that church congregations, which are groups
of transformed individuals, would manifest a sense of the peace and community Christian faith claims occurs when people follow Christ. One would think that a
church would be the one place we might see personal spiritual flourishing that gradually infects the arts, sciences, personal
health, joy, and delight -- every part of those who live in these communities.
Please understand; I am not expecting heaven on earth. I am
not expecting that we will ever become in this life what can only occur in the
next. I am only asking whether any hint of those coming things ought to occur
today and that if they do not, what sorts of proof do we have that they ever will? Shouldn’t we expect non-believers to judge for themselves the quality of life --
personal and communal – that Christian faith produces?
In The Mountain of Silence, author Kyriacos Markides
writes, “the spiritual struggle … aims at healing our existence, our
personhood, and sealing our communion with the Divine, which is our real
destination and the justification of our being in the world. As long as this
goal is not reached, we will continue to function in an imperfect, pathological
way, experiencing one injustice after another. The social world we collectively
create will naturally reflect this pathology that lies within ourselves. “
My reading of the New Testament calls me to reject the
popular Christian notion that we can only expect to be forgiven but never transformed. That idea implies that I can just pick up my “get out of hell free card” without worrying about the
dysfunctions of heart, mind and body – the illnesses of soul – that create war,
crime, disease and poverty. I can sing happy songs about Jesus without asking
why I am not rising out of the gunk of life.
I find this avoidance of the central questions of life
increasingly unbearable. It is church business at the expense of spiritual
life.
If Christians are not changed, Christianity is not true. If
it is not true, it should not be preached. It is unethical to make a living
from something that doesn’t work. Disneyland makes a good living promoting
mythology but they acknowledge that their business is entertainment. If that is
our business, we should say so. If we claim we are presenting reality, then we must
demonstrate proof.
I claim that Saints are the only real proof that Jesus rose
from the dead, or that the Holy Scriptures contain anything that contemporary
people should find compelling. If we have no saints to present, then we have
very little to say.
It is because I believe a person can become a saint -- not
merely declared a saint but become a saint -- that I continue to walk the
Christian life. Believing that, I study the scriptures and try to apply their
lessons to life. I enter worship expecting to experience the transcendence and
awe that leads a person to step out of those natural circumstances of family,
economy and intellect where God finds Him and on into the patterns of thought
and life that forms him into a “new man in Christ.”
Sainthood is not mere escapist otherworldliness though. God
made this world, this material world, for us – for us to know, enjoy and use.
The material world is our appointed realm and the primary place of our spiritual
stewardship.
That’s why I study those disciplines of human life to which
I have been attracted. I read science journals because I believe God created
the world and that He delights when we discover its secrets. I read novels
because I believe in the arts, through which human beings express echoes of
divine creation.
Saint Irenaeus said, “the glory of God is a person fully
alive.” If the foundation of Christianity is the resurrection of Christ, then
it follows that the definition of a saint is a person fully alive.
Culture wars, political fights, church spats, feuds,
religious control of others, backbiting, gossiping – all these things are
evidence for the opposing view – that Christianity offers nothing compelling or
even real for the broken systems and the broken people of the world.
Saints, people who have been made fully alive, is what manifests the reality of Jesus to the nations of the world.
That, or nothing.
2 comments:
Dan,
I've struggled with this for so long. Perhaps it is the most silent/giant issue we face.
Thanks for putting it in some concrete language.
Wish we could talk.
T. Norris
Thanks Dan!
Post a Comment